![]() ![]() That is, to what extent can a liar who learns about the Model Statement tool and about the proportion of complications successfully adjust her/his responses so that s/he sounds like a truth teller? Research examining the Model Statement tool and the proportion of complications has been published and is accessible to everyone through the internet. In the current experiment, we addressed the extent to which the Model Statement tool and the proportion of complications are vulnerable to countermeasures. This resulted in interview protocols such as the Model Statement tool ( Leal, Vrij, Warmelink, Vernham, & Fisher, 2015 Vrij, Leal, & Fisher, 2018) and in new verbal cues, such as the proportion of complications ( Vrij, Leal, Jupe et al., 2018). They also have started to examine verbal cues to deception not previously examined before ( Nahari, 2018 Vrij, Leal, Jupe, & Harvey, 2018). ![]() ![]() In response to this, researchers have started to examine whether cues to deceit could be enhanced or elicited through specific interview protocols ( Vrij & Granhag, 2012). The Efficacy of Using Countermeasures in a Model Statement Interviewĭeception research has shown that cues to deceit are typically faint and unreliable ( DePaulo et al., 2003). En realidad, las diferencias de veracidad fueron semejantes en todas las condiciones experimentales: los que decían la verdad informaron con mayor detalle y de más complicaciones y obtuvieron una mayor puntuación en la proporción de complicaciones que los mentirosos. No encontramos evidencia de que los mentirosos se parecieran a los que dicen la verdad después de ser informados sobre la Declaración modelo y los tipos de detalle que examinamos. Antes de la entrevista habían recibido o no información sobre (i) el funcionamiento de la Declaración modelo y (ii) tres tipos de detalles verbales: complicaciones, detalles de conocimiento general y estrategias de autoobstaculización. Los participantes eran de origen libanés, mexicano y surcoreano. Los que dicen la verdad declararon sobre un viaje que habían hecho los mentirosos inventaron una historia. Actually, veracity differences were similar across experimental conditions, with truth tellers reporting more detail and more complications and obtaining a higher proportion of complications score than liars.Įn un experimento de contramedidas examinamos hasta qué punto los mentirosos que reciben información sobre la Declaración modelo y la proporción de complicaciones que presenta (complicaciones / complicaciones + detalles de conocimiento general + estrategias de autoobstaculización) pueden ajustar sus respuestas con éxito para que parezca que dicen la verdad. We found no evidence that liars sounded like truth tellers after being informed about the Model Statement and/or types of detail we examined. Prior to the interview they did or did not receive information about (i) the working of the Model statement and (ii) three types of verbal detail: complications, common knowledge details and self-handicapping strategies. Participants were of Lebanese, Mexican, and South-Korean origin. Truth tellers discussed a trip they had made liars fabricated a story. In a countermeasures experiment, we examined to what extent liars who learn about the Model Statement tool and about the proportion of complications (complications/complications + common knowledge details + self-handicapping strategies) can successfully adjust their responses so that they sound like truth tellers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |